Author Archives: Craig

More Scalia/Thomas stuff

Regular readers will recall my surprise at the Scalia/Thomas split on COPA. Apparently they don’t disagree as infrequently as I had supposed, and this analysis makes an argument that it’s due to genuine differences in judicial philosophy and reasoning. And since the philosophy attributed to Thomas requires an absence of critical thinking, I find the argument persuasive.
Eleven and a half years later, TNR seems to have removed that article. Here is the Wayback Machine’s version.

I feel so special

I now have a gmail account, and have been given one invitation to issue. To preserve domestic harmony, I issued it to the other person living at my house, but I’m hopeful I will get more soon. If you want one, and I know you, drop me a line and I’ll queue you up in some arbitrary order. Ah, the power.

No more Ma Bell 'round here

They’re not closing up shop or anything, but AT&T’s announcement that they’re no longer going to compete for customers in seven states (including Washington) is also an announcement that you can get local and/or long distance cheaper elsewhere, usually from the folks who own the wire running to your house.

Not naming names here

While I love getting traffic, I don’t think I want the kind of traffic we’d get if I were to name the product, its best-known male counterpart, or the conditions they respectively treat. I must, nevertheless, link to this press release announcing the completion of Phase II trials for a promising product, just because of this phrase: "The primary data (frequency of satisfying sexual events)".