Author Archives: Craig

Visionary in Residence Review

Visionary in Residence, Sterling. No. This was quite a struggle for me to finish. I usually enjoy Sterling’s work, and I did enjoy the final two stories in this collection, but the rest, by and large, made me think that he was taking the title of the collection (which is also, I believe, his job title where he’s a visiting professor of design or some such) far too seriously. I really don’t care how smart you are, or how smart you think I am, just use the right words in the right order. Almost no one is good enough to show off and get it right.

Happy anniversary or something

July seems to be a traditionally busy month for the Collective. It was four years ago this month that we (well, Sarah) started blogging (I know this because the original Smelltone blog is still out there, gathering dust). In November of that same year, we moved the blog to our own site, and there it has remained ever since (not counting a migration from Greymatter to Movable Type and from our "free with ISP" page to a formally hosted one).

The Psycho Ex Game Review

The Psycho Ex Game, Markoe and Prieboy. Yes. Not flawless, but enjoyable. It was impossible for me not to speculate on which stories had been pulled completely from experience, and which had been given writers’ embellishments (or just plain invented). Further fueling that impulse is the fact that Recipe Cards have been posted by (or at least on behalf of) the authors. Also available: the song that started it all. I’ve been a fan of Ms Markoe’s work for more than twenty years, and while I don’t think this is the best book she’s been involved with creating, it does have a unique voyeuristic appeal.
(I’m getting "bandwidth exceeded" errors from the links to the book’s website; I’m hoping they’ll get more bandwidth at the beginning of the month (i.e., tomorrow))

the accidental Review

the accidental, Smith. Yes. This is Ali Smith, not Zadie Smith of On Beauty, though this book, too, performed well (this one took first place) in the Tournament of Books. There is much I might have disliked about this book: the narrative style is flashy, there are not-infrequent somewhat extended passages where a narrative voice becomes fascinated with words, the structure does not lend itself to inattentive reading, those sorts of things. But the only features of the novel that bothered me were the typesetting (I never before realized how much easier to read a fully justified line of text is than ragged-right) and the title (for reasons I can’t possibly discover, I could not think of the title without starting to compose a song to the tune of “The Carioca” (“oh, have you read the accidental? It’s really very continental…” or “It’s only somewhat sentimental…”); ugh).
Update: To clarify somewhat, I’m a big fan of flashy narrative and am frequently myself fascinated with words to the point of distraction, but it’s been so long since I’ve read an author who could do those things in service of the story and the characters, rather than as an intrusive plea for attention, that I’ve taken to looking for simplicity. I suspect it may be easier for attention-seeking works to get published, so I have a notion that a simply written work that made it to my library shelves is more likely to be well crafted. Ali Smith’s verbal and structural games proved to be a delightful surprise.

On Beauty Review

On Beauty, Smith. No. I chose this due to its performance in the Tournament of Books. I started to hate it with the first sentence, but forced myself to give it more of a look. It finally defeated me ten pages in with its power of making me not give a rat’s ass about any of the characters. Oddly (since the author is from London), I found the idiomatic English overdone, as though she is writing for an American audience of hyper-Anglophiles. Even the American character speaks like a Brit—"How am I meant to react?"—though this is not consistent, as she later says "ass", which her husband re-figures to "arse". All in all, very distracting.

Books of Swords Review

The First, Second, and Third Books of Swords, Saberhagen. If you like that sort of thing. I re-read these to see whether I missed anything cool in Ardneh’s Sword. The refresher did clear up the otherwise-inexplicable pointless character from AS, but, if anything, made the latter work even more of a disappointment in retrospect. There’s not even the slightest hint, in the fairly explicit exegesis presented in the Swords books, of the direction Saberhagen would, twenty-odd years on, decide to retrofit into the saga. I can construct a somewhat tortuous chain of reasoning by which the two ontogenies are not outright incompatible, but the author should be shooting for a very satisfying click as all the pieces fit together, not "Well, if you interpret what Draffut said this way, I suppose it still makes sense…."
On their own, the three original Swords books are just fine, as is the Empire of the East before them. I don’t have any immediate intent to re-read the eight Lost Swords books.

Patently rhetorical questions

Toward the end of an article about how computers are getting too good at text recognition is an odd bit: "H-P no longer owns the patent, said Brigida Bergkamp, a spokeswoman for the technology giant. She declined to disclose what had happened to the patent." The patent was acquired by an undisclosed buyer? Isn’t the point of a patent to get people to license it? Isn’t that made harder if they can’t find out who you are? Isn’t who holds a patent public information?