<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ForcedPerspective &#187; Craig&#8217;s Book Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forcedperspective.org/category/craigs-book-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forcedperspective.org</link>
	<description>Forcing our perspectives since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:11:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>An Uncertain Place Review</title>
		<link>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2012/02/an-uncertain-place-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2012/02/an-uncertain-place-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Craig's Book Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forcedperspective.org/?p=3894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Uncertain Place: a Commissaire Adamsberg Mystery, Vargas, tr. Reynolds. Yes. I continue to be fond of Vargas&#8217;s hero, Commissaire Adamsberg, and the writing and (perhaps especially) translation are lovely, but I fear the plots are becoming more involved than I need. Vargas is not nearly on the thin ice that Tepper is, though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://catalog.kcls.org/opac/en-US/skin/kcls/xml/rdetail.xml?rt=isbn&#038;adv=9780143120049"><em>An Uncertain Place: a Commissaire Adamsberg Mystery</em></a>, Vargas, tr. Reynolds.  Yes.  I continue to be fond of Vargas&rsquo;s hero, <em>Commissaire</em> Adamsberg, and the writing and (perhaps especially) translation are lovely, but I fear the plots are becoming more involved than I need.  <!-- Really, does every murderer need to have, or happen upon a personal connection to Adamsberg, ideally going back decades? -->  Vargas is not nearly on the thin ice that <a href="/2010/11/the-waters-rising-review/">Tepper</a> is, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2012/02/an-uncertain-place-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dead Mann Walking Review</title>
		<link>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/12/dead-mann-walking-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/12/dead-mann-walking-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 04:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Craig's Book Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forcedperspective.org/?p=3827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dead Mann Walking: A Hessius Mann Novel, Petrucha. Yes. Petrucha has created a unique (to my knowledge) first-person narrator in Hessius Mann. I am looking forward to the next installment to see if he can maintain the level of interest, given Tana French&#8217;s rationale in giving each of her Dublin Murder Squad books a different [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://catalog.kcls.org/opac/en-US/skin/kcls/xml/rdetail.xml?rt=isbn&#038;adv=9780451464217">Dead Mann Walking: A Hessius Mann Novel</a></em>, Petrucha.  Yes.  Petrucha has created a unique (to my knowledge) first-person narrator in Hessius Mann.  I am looking forward to the next installment to see if he can maintain the level of interest, given Tana French&#8217;s rationale in giving each of her Dublin Murder Squad books a different protagonist: it&#8217;s hard to justify life-changing events happening to the same person over and over.  Some aspects of <em>DMW</em> resonate with another recent work I also enjoyed<!-- Torchwood: Miracle Day-->; I think it rather validates Petrucha&#8217;s vision that a different group of talented writers went in a similar direction given a related premise.  The only passage that pulled me out of the narrative was the improper (and strained) use of &ldquo;to coin a phrase.&rdquo;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/12/dead-mann-walking-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reaper Man Review</title>
		<link>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/12/reaper-man-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/12/reaper-man-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 04:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Craig's Book Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forcedperspective.org/?p=3825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reaper Man: A Novel of Discworld&#174;, Pratchett. Yes. Again, Pratchett provides reliable entertainment. This one introduces a particularly entertaining minor character, and Death can always be relied upon to add that certain something.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://catalog.kcls.org/opac/en-US/skin/kcls/xml/rdetail.xml?rt=isbn&#038;adv=9780061020629">Reaper Man: A Novel of Discworld&reg;</a></em>, Pratchett.  Yes.  Again, Pratchett provides reliable entertainment.  This one introduces a particularly entertaining minor character, and Death can always be relied upon to add that certain something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/12/reaper-man-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goliath Review</title>
		<link>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/11/goliath-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/11/goliath-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 04:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Craig's Book Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forcedperspective.org/?p=3790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Goliath, Westerfeld. Yes. Follows Leviathan and Behemoth. If you&#8217;ve read them, you know whether you want to read this; if not, I recommend you start with them. I noted no mechanical difficulties, most likely because the story was holding me captive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://catalog.kcls.org/opac/en-US/skin/kcls/xml/rdetail.xml?rt=isbn&#038;adv=9781416971771"><em>Goliath</em></a>, Westerfeld.  Yes.  Follows <a href="/2009/11/leviathan-review/"><em>Leviathan</em></a> and <a href="/2010/11/behemoth-review/"><em>Behemoth</em></a>.  If you&#8217;ve read them, you know whether you want to read this; if not, I recommend you start with them.  I noted no mechanical difficulties, most likely because the story was holding me captive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/11/goliath-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tears of Autumn Review</title>
		<link>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/11/tears-of-autumn-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/11/tears-of-autumn-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 23:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Craig's Book Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forcedperspective.org/?p=3763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tears of Autumn, McCarry. Yes. I&#8217;m tempted to believe that every aspect of the theory presented in this 1974 political thriller is true, it hangs together so nicely. The writing is also very good.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://catalog.kcls.org/opac/en-US/skin/kcls/xml/rdetail.xml?rt=isbn&#038;adv=9781585676613"><em>The Tears of Autumn</em></a>, McCarry.  Yes.  I&#8217;m tempted to believe that every aspect of the theory presented in this 1974 political thriller is true, it hangs together so nicely.  The writing is also very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/11/tears-of-autumn-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Writing Movies for Fun and Profit Review</title>
		<link>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/09/writing-movies-for-fun-and-profit-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/09/writing-movies-for-fun-and-profit-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 19:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Craig's Book Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forcedperspective.org/?p=3701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Writing Movies for Fun and Profit: How We Made a Billion Dollars at the Box Office and You Can, Too!, Garant &#38; Lennon. Non-Fiction. This is a ruthlessly practical guide to selling screenplays to Hollywood studios. It also provides appalling and entertaining insight into what is required of a writer in order to make a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://catalog.kcls.org/opac/en-US/skin/kcls/xml/rdetail.xml?rt=isbn&#038;adv=9781439186756">Writing Movies for <del>Fun and</del> Profit: How We Made a Billion Dollars at the Box Office and You Can, Too!</a></em>, Garant &amp; Lennon.  Non-Fiction.  This is a ruthlessly practical guide to selling screenplays to Hollywood studios.  It also provides appalling and entertaining insight into what is required of a writer in order to make a living doing that.  If you are at all interested in the business of writing Hollywood studio movies, I encourage you to read this book.  Even if you&rsquo;re not, it&rsquo;s probably worth a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/09/writing-movies-for-fun-and-profit-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Invisible Things Review</title>
		<link>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/09/invisible-things-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/09/invisible-things-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 21:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Craig's Book Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forcedperspective.org/?p=3675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Invisible Things, Davidson. Yes. Follows The Explosionist. Picks up near where its predecessor left off, and is another just fine YA novel. This one is more openly setting up for a follow-up book, which, if history is any guide, should be showing up in a year or so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://catalog.kcls.org/opac/en-US/skin/kcls/xml/rdetail.xml?rt=isbn&#038;adv=9780061239786">Invisible Things</a>, Davidson.  Yes.  Follows <a href="/2011/08/explosionist-review/" title="Explosionist Review"><em>The Explosionist</em></a>.  Picks up near where its predecessor left off, and is another just fine YA novel.  This one is more openly setting up for a follow-up book, which, if history is any guide, should be showing up in a year or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/09/invisible-things-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fat Vampire Review</title>
		<link>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/08/fat-vampire-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/08/fat-vampire-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 18:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Craig's Book Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forcedperspective.org/?p=3656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fat Vampire: A Never Coming of Age Story, Rex. No. This came highly recommended, and has plenty of positive traits (two in particular: it&#8217;s mechanically sound, an incorrect &#8220;whomever&#8221; notwithstanding; and it has largely believable characterization), but it has two (to me) fatal flaws: it has way too much explanation, and it strikes me as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://catalog.kcls.org/opac/en-US/skin/kcls/xml/rdetail.xml?rt=isbn&#038;adv=9780061920905"><em>Fat Vampire: A Never Coming of Age Story</em></a>, Rex.  No.  This came highly recommended, and has plenty of positive traits (two in particular: it&rsquo;s mechanically sound, an incorrect &ldquo;whomever&rdquo; notwithstanding; and it has largely believable characterization), but it has two (to me) fatal flaws:  it has way too much explanation, and it strikes me as far too interested in amassing geek credibility.  These two characteristics combine particularly gratingly in the <i>Rocky Horror</i> scene, which walks us torturously through nearly every nuance of the viewing experience.  Granted, plenty of plot and character advancement is occurring during the sequence, but I have to believe every bit of it could have been accomplished better without the artificial framework imposed by having it happen at a night out at a movie&mdash;especially when the author feels it necessary to explain so much of the night out.<br />
This book would have been much better if Rex had worked harder on not telling us so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/08/fat-vampire-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Explosionist Review</title>
		<link>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/08/explosionist-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/08/explosionist-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 02:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Craig's Book Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forcedperspective.org/?p=3638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Explosionist, Davidson. Yes. There were a number of features of this book that annoyed me: it&#8217;s nearly tiresome in the same ways that Jo Walton&#8217;s &#8220;Small Change&#8221; series was nearly tiresome (it is conceptually similar to Walton&#8217;s work, too); I discovered that I do not much care for the taint of outright fantasy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://catalog.kcls.org/opac/en-US/skin/kcls/xml/rdetail.xml?rt=isbn&#038;adv=9780061239755"><em>The Explosionist</em></a>, Davidson.  Yes.  There were a number of features of this book that annoyed me:  it&rsquo;s nearly tiresome in the same ways that Jo Walton&rsquo;s &ldquo;<a href="/2008/10/hapenny-review/">Small</a> <a href="/2008/10/half-a-crown-review/">Change</a>&rdquo; series was nearly tiresome (it is conceptually similar to Walton&rsquo;s work, too); I discovered that I do not much care for the taint of outright fantasy <!-- or maybe it's just spiritualism being anything other than fraud that will get my back up -->in my historical speculative fiction; and there was this:<br />
<blockquote>Dismissed, Sophie slipped upstairs just in time to avoid the inevitable awkward encounter with Miss Gillespie in the hall.</p></blockquote>
<p>On the other hand, that sentence was the only time Davidson&rsquo;s writing pulled me completely out of the story, and I found the characters believable enough, and some moments were quite well executed.<!--The séance talking to the roommate's brother, for instance--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/08/explosionist-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fuzzy Sapiens Review</title>
		<link>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/07/fuzzy-sapiens-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/07/fuzzy-sapiens-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 04:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Craig's Book Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forcedperspective.org/?p=3587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fuzzy Sapiens (Note: link is to single-volume release of Little Fuzzy and Fuzzy Sapiens (then titled The Other Human Race)), Piper. Yes. I read this as part of my ongoing quest to understand why the Fuzzy universe got rebooted, and in this sequel to Little Fuzzy, I am finally seeing why it might be desirable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://catalog.kcls.org/opac/en-US/skin/kcls/xml/rdetail.xml?r=306149"><em>Fuzzy Sapiens</em></a> <small>(Note: link is to single-volume release of <em>Little Fuzzy</em> and <em>Fuzzy Sapiens</em> (then titled <em>The Other Human Race</em>))</small>, Piper.  Yes.  I read this as part of my <a href="/2011/06/fuzzy-nation-review/">ongoing</a> <a href="/2011/07/little-fuzzy-review/">quest</a> to understand why the Fuzzy universe got rebooted, and in this sequel to <em>Little Fuzzy</em>, I am finally seeing why it might be desirable to leave large chunks of this canon behind.  I wouldn&rsquo;t presume to speculate that the things I would leave behind are the same ones that Scalzi will, but I will say that the constant and universal smoking is among the least jarring of things I would pretend never happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forcedperspective.org/2011/07/fuzzy-sapiens-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

